Afghanistan: Casualties

Lord Avebury: asked Her Majesty's Government:
	What is their response to the statement by the Agency Co-ordinating Body for Afghan Relief (ACBAR) on 19 June that at least 230 civilian deaths have been caused by international and Afghan government forces since the start of 2007; which of the recommendations they accept; and what action they will take, unilaterally, through NATO and through liaison with Operation Enduring Freedom and Afghan military forces to ensure conformity with international humanitarian and human rights law and to protect civilian lives.

Baroness Royall of Blaisdon: All civilian casualties are a source of profound regret. Any loss of innocent lives is a tragedy. The UK joins the Agency Co-ordinating Body for Afghan Relief in condemning the actions of armed insurgents causing civilian casualties. The Taliban is responsible for the vast majority of civilian casualties, deliberately launching attacks from civilian locations such as schools and using suicide bombs and improvised explosive devices. The Taliban is quick to exaggerate and exploit any deaths caused by international forces.
	International forces, including UK forces, seek at all times to avoid loss of civilian life. The targeting process, weapons selection, doctrine, training and rules of engagement are all in line with international humanitarian and human rights law and the law of armed conflict.
	The Afghan security forces operate alongside two international forces, the International Security Assistance Force and Operation Enduring Freedom. Co-ordination between these groups is therefore key and has been the subject of further work over recent weeks. We are satisfied that there are sensible, pragmatic command and control relationships between the forces and that these are reassessed regularly.
	All reports of civilian casualties are investigated promptly and thoroughly, in co-ordination with the Afghan authorities. Where the UN Assistance Mission in Afghanistan chooses to investigate an incident, it is entirely free to do so.

Agriculture: Pigs and Poultry

Baroness Byford: asked Her Majesty's Government:
	Whether discussions between the Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs and the Environment Agency will result in integrated pollution prevention control charges being reduced for pig and poultry farmers.

Lord Rooker: I recently met representatives of the intensive livestock rearing industry to discuss permit charges and, in particular, how annual charges might be reduced through streamlined approaches to inspection. The Environment Agency and the National Farmers' Union are currently considering options, including what greater use might be made of assurance scheme visits.
	The Pollution Prevention and Control (England and Wales) Regulations 2000 require permit applications to be accompanied by the prescribed fee. The Environment Agency must seek to recover its full costs in accordance with HM Treasury guidance. The agency will review the costs when the majority of the applications have been assessed and the full extent of the work is known.

Armed Forces: Airbridges

Lord Astor of Hever: asked Her Majesty's Government:
	How many times the current Assistant Chief of the Defence Staff (Logistics) travelled as an ordinary passenger on the airbridge (a) from the United Kingdom to Iraq; (b) from Iraq to the United Kingdom; (c) from the United Kingdom to Afghanistan; and (d) from Afghanistan to the United Kingdom; and on what dates these journeys took place; and
	How many staff the Assistant Chief of the Defence Staff (Logistics) has whose work is exclusively related to airbridges (a) from the United Kingdom to Iraq; (b) from Iraq to the United Kingdom; (c) from the United Kingdom to Afghanistan; and (d) from Afghanistan to the United Kingdom; and what ranks they hold; and
	What budget the Assistant Chief of the Defence Staff (Logistics) has for the purposes of his responsibilities for airbridges (a) from the United Kingdom to Iraq; (b) from Iraq to the United Kingdom; (c) from the United Kingdom to Afghanistan; and (d) from Afghanistan to the United Kingdom.

Lord Drayson: The Assistant Chief of the Defence Staff (ACDS (Log Ops)) uses the military airbridge as required by his current appointment. He has used it extensively in previous appointments and most recently in June 2007 to Afghanistan, just a short time after assuming his current appointment.
	ACDS (Log Ops) does not have staff dedicated to the detailed execution of air movements but, as the 2* chairman of the Air Movements Stakeholder Group set up in late 2006, he is responsible for ensuring that the efforts of the many agencies working directly in this area are properly co-ordinated.
	As the MoD's air movements process co-ordinator, ACDS (Log Ops) does not have budgetary or command responsibility for assets but is accountable to the Chief of Defence Materiel for air movements process, policy and capability and to the Chief of Joint Operations and the Chiefs of Staff for ensuring that the air movements process is able to continue to support current operations.

Armed Forces: Future Aircraft Carrier

Lord Chidgey: asked Her Majesty's Government:
	Whether, following the collaboration with the French on design development for three Future aircraft carriers, they have decided to collaborate on the construction of these warships; if so, (a) whether collaboration would be on a Government-to-Government or industry-to-industry basis; and (b) what impact this would have on the Future aircraft carriers programme.

Lord Drayson: Work with France on potential further co-operation on aircraft carriers is currently progressing at both a governmental and industrial level. Any such co-operation must deliver cost savings and must do so without delaying UK or French programmes.

Bridges Community Ventures

Lord Oakeshott of Seagrove Bay: asked Her Majesty's Government:
	In view of the responsibility of Bridges Community Ventures Limited for £20 million of taxpayers' money, which members of its board are either (a) not resident, or (b) not domiciled in the United Kingdom for tax purposes.

Lord Davies of Oldham: HM Revenue and Customs is under a statutory duty not to disclose the tax affairs of individuals.

Equality: Age Discrimination

Viscount Montgomery of Alamein: asked Her Majesty's Government:
	Whether age discrimination legislation prevents local councils that run weekly two-hour walks as part of their adult education programme from giving concessions to pensioners on the fees they charge.

Lord Triesman: Guidance on the vocational training aspects of the Employment Equality (Age) Regulations is available on the DBERR website. It is aimed at, among others, providers of further and adult education.
	The guidance makes it clear that age-related practices, such as age-related fee concessions, may be objectively justified where they are a proportionate means of achieving a legitimate aim. It is for providers to produce evidence of such objective justification if called upon to do so, or to take their own legal advice if necessary. Guidance on objective justification is also available on page 30 of the ACAS guidance on the age regulations.

Extradition

Earl Attlee: asked Her Majesty's Government:
	Whether the European Convention on Human Rights applies to extradition cases involving United Kingdom citizens.

Lord Bassam of Brighton: Under the Extradition Act 2003 the district judge in this country must consider whether a person's extradition would be compatible with that person's ECHR rights, within the meaning of the Human Rights Act 1998.
	These rights are applicable to everyone who finds themselves the subject of an extradition request made to the UK, irrespective of their nationality.

Internet: Names Registration

Lord Dykes: asked Her Majesty's Government:
	What plans they have to expand the management capacity for country code United Kingdom top civil domain names by Nominet and JANET(UK) for enhanced internet names registration.

Lord Drayson: The domain name system in the UK is operated by the private sector therefore the Government have no direct formal role in planning the management capacity of the UK country code top-level domain.
	Nominet UK, a private not-for-profit company, runs the registry for dot.uk internet domain names: it is responsive to the internet industry through its membership structure and works in the interests of all stakeholders.
	JANET(UK) is responsible for the country code dot.gb. This domain is considered dormant. It remains reserved and is unavailable for new registrations in order to avoid potential confusion with the well established dot.uk domain.

Israel and Palestine: Quartet

Lord Hylton: asked Her Majesty's Government:
	Whether they will place in the Library of the House the full terms of reference for Mr Blair as the quartet's representative in the Middle East.

Baroness Royall of Blaisdon: On 27 June, the quartet (EU, US, UN and Russia) principals announced the right honourable Tony Blair's appointment as quartet representative. As set out in the quartet statement of 27 June, the former Prime Minister's mandate is to: mobilise international assistance to the Palestinians, working closely with donors and existing co-ordination bodies; help to identify, and secure appropriate international support in addressing, the institutional governance needs of the Palestinian state, focusing as a matter of urgency on the rule of law; develop plans to promote Palestinian economic development, including private-sector partnerships, building on previously agreed frameworks, especially concerning access and movement; and liase with other countries as appropriate in support of the agreed quartet objectives.
	A copy of the quartet statement will be placed in the Library.

Taxation: Overseas Authorities

Lord Monson: asked Her Majesty's Government:
	Under what legislative authority HM Revenue and Customs is able to respond to requests from overseas tax authorities for information from United Kingdom organisations or companies about moneys paid to non-United Kingdom nationals resident overseas.

Lord Davies of Oldham: The obligation to provide information to overseas tax authorities derives from a variety of European Union instruments and bilateral arrangements with countries and territories overseas. However, the legislation permitting disclosure that is most relevant to such requests is Section 197 of the Finance Act 2003 in relation to requests by EU member states under Council Directive 77/799/EEC, as amended, and Section 173(4) of the Finance Act 2006 in relation to requests made under the terms of a bilateral tax arrangement.

Taxation: Overseas Authorities

Lord Monson: asked Her Majesty's Government:
	What powers HM Revenue and Customs has in the event that informal requests made by it for assistance from United Kingdom organisations or companies in connection with requests from overseas tax authorities are declined.

Lord Davies of Oldham: The most relevant powers are those contained in Section 125 of the Finance Act 1990 and Section 174 of the Finance Act 2006. The UK's normal domestic information powers for the purposes of administering VAT and excises may also be used for the purposes of administrative co-operation with other EU member states in those fields, in accordance with the relevant EU regulations.

Taxation: Overseas Authorities

Lord Monson: asked Her Majesty's Government:
	What safeguards are in place to ensure that only reasonable and proportionate requests by overseas tax authorities for the provision or the exchange of information about individuals are acceded to.

Lord Davies of Oldham: A number of such safeguards exist. In particular, all requests must conform to the terms of the appropriate instrument governing exchange of information. There is no obligation on the UK authorities to carry out measures that would be at variance with the laws or administrative practice of either the United Kingdom or the overseas country or territory. There is no obligation to supply information that would be contrary to public policy.
	The UK authorities are not obliged to provide any information unless the overseas tax authority is bound by, or has undertaken to observe, rules of confidentiality with respect to the information which are not less strict than those applying to that information in the United Kingdom.

Taxation: Overseas Authorities

Lord Stoddart of Swindon: asked Her Majesty's Government:
	With which countries they have bilateral agreements which facilitate the provision of information by HM Revenue and Customs at the request of overseas tax authorities.

Lord Davies of Oldham: The United Kingdom has bilateral agreements providing for exchange of information on request with 120 countries and territories. The full list of agreements in force is available on the HM Revenue and Customs website at: www.hmrc.gov.uk/international/in_force.htm

Taxation: Overseas Authorities

Lord Stoddart of Swindon: asked Her Majesty's Government:
	Whether HM Revenue and Customs invariably responds positively to requests made by the tax authorities of the Government of Russia for the provision or exchange of information about individuals.

Lord Davies of Oldham: Under the terms of the bilateral double taxation convention between the United Kingdom and the Russian Federation, the competent authorities of both contracting states exchange such information as is necessary for carrying out the provisions of the convention or the domestic laws of the contracting states on a reciprocal basis. If a request falls within the terms of the convention, and none of the restrictions set out in the convention or in UK domestic law apply, then the UK competent authority will endeavour to respond positively to the request.

Taxation: Overseas Authorities

Lord Stoddart of Swindon: asked Her Majesty's Government:
	How many requests for the provision or exchange of information from the tax authorities of the Government of Russia they have received in the past 12 months; and how many requests they have acceded to.

Lord Davies of Oldham: HM Revenue and Customs does not release statistics on the number of exchanges of information with individual countries and territories, as release of this information may be detrimental to tax enforcement and the operation of the relevant arrangements under which the information is exchanged.

Translation: DWP

Lord Hanningfield: asked Her Majesty's Government:
	How much Jobcentre Plus, and previously the Employment Services, spent on translation services in each of the past five years; and
	How much the Disability and Carers Service spent on translation services in each year of its existence; and
	How much the Child Support Agency spent on translation services in each of the past five years; and
	How much the Pension Service spent on translation services in each year of its existence.

Lord McKenzie of Luton: The information is not available in the format requested. Translation services are available to the department's agencies through the ethnic translation services framework to translate forms, leaflets, reports and letters. A breakdown of each agency's costs is not available.
	In 2006-07, the department spent around £267,500 on translation services. Information is not available for previous years other than at disproportionate cost.

Transport: Heavy Goods Vehicles

Lord Bradshaw: asked Her Majesty's Government:
	For the last three years for which figures are available, how many cyclists and pedestrians have been (a) killed, or (b) seriously injured in road accidents involving heavy goods vehicles in Great Britain.

Lord Bassam of Brighton: The information requested is given in the table:
	
		
			 Number of pedestrians and pedal cyclists killed or seriously injured in reported personal injury road accidents involving at least one heavy goods vehicle: GB: 2004-06 
			 Number of casualties 
			  Pedestrians  Pedal cyclists  
			  Killed Seriously injured Killed Seriously injured 
			 2004 86 171 22 91 
			 2005 78 186 26 80 
			 2006 73 170 25 92